Question by : 8 Core AMD FX8150 or Quad Core Intel i5 2400/2500? I am looking forward to building my own custom computer. I have a pretty solid understanding on most computer parts, but not the greatest expertise. I want to build a rig, that will get games like BF3, and Minecraft to be played at their highest settings, but I also want a machine that will do some basic video editing and a lot of intense school work. I also want to put an EVGA GTX Superclocked 550ti. Would you suggest the 8 Core AMD Processor or the Quad Core Intel Processor. Both are in the sub- $ 200 price range and pretty solid reviews. Which would be best for me? Best answer for 8 Core AMD FX8150 or Quad Core Intel i5 2400/2500?:
Answer by AKAVENOM
If you were to go with the Intel, which in my opinion is the better choice, go with the i5 3570k instead of the 2500k. The 3570k is 3rd Gen. and A bit faster than the 2500 for around the same price. But, if you are to get it, try to go with the Z77 chipset on your motherboard. And Intel is better than AMD because Intel will last longer years. And also in this case, 8 cores means nothing. I would go with the Intel.
Answer by live4mtndew
Get the Amd one as you get more bang for your buck with AMD and better performance (8 cores is better than 4) for the price. So if you Choose right and go with AMD, get the ASUS crosshair V Formula. Pretty sexy Mobo and compatible with the 8150 :)
Answer by Frag Master
Performance Analysis With the addition of numbers for the Intel Core i3-2100 and Core i5-2400 in some of our benchmarks, it's plain to see that even with a price cut, the FX-8120 struggles in most of our tests. In very multi-threaded tests such as Cinebench and WPrime, it just about manages to hold its own against the similarly-priced Intel Core i5-2400 - slightly ahead in WPrime, a little behind in Cinebench and noticeably faster than the cheaper Core i3-2100. The Core i5-3570K is much faster in both tests, but then it costs around £30 more. Our image editing test was a real let down with the FX-8120. It came bottom of the graph, being trounced by a staggering 500 points by the Core i3-2100 - a CPU that costs just £90. Even the ageing AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition was considerably faster while the similarly priced Intel Core i5-2400 was nearly twice as fast. Clearly, if you do any amount of photo editing, the AMD FX-8120 represents particularly poor value. With eight cores at its disposal, you'd think the FX-8120 might stand a good chance in our video encoding test. Sadly this wasn't to be and its score of 2,150 was over 400 points short of the Core i5-2400. Thankfully for the FX-8120, the Core i3-2100 was noticeably slower, with its two physical and two virtual cores not able to keep up. Everything started to fall away from the FX-8120 again in our multi-tasking test, where it was yet again at the bottom of the pile, coming 100 points short of the much cheaper Core i3-2100, while the Core i5-2400 was nearly 50% faster - pretty damning result. Overall, it was no surprise to see the FX-8120 rock bottom, bettered by the Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition and Core i3-2100 and trounced by the Core i5-2400. Our game test lacks data for the two Sandy Bridge CPUs as we tested these some time ago, however, with the Intel Core i5-3570K retailing for just £30-40 more, it's clear from our results that the FX-8120 isn't a great buy for games either. The Intel CPU was 60 per cent faster in Arma II while costing around 30 per cent more - not a bad rate of return if you can afford the extra layout. - Conclusion, Sadly, its more of the same bad news for AMD or anyone with a Socket AM3+ motherboard looking for a decent CPU for around the £150 mark. The FX-8120 just isn't a good choice when it comes to the kind of applications we run on our PCs. It's regularly outpaced by far cheaper Intel dual-core CPUs, while the similarly-priced Intel Core i5-2400 is significantly faster in many of our tests. It's not all bad news for AMD - before we get accused of being biased towards Intel, we have no qualms recommending the A8-3870K for those looking to build a budget gaming PC, while we also recommend many of its graphics cards. As it stands, the FX-8120 will have to be a lot cheaper for it to be worth considering over an equivalently-priced Intel setup, while owners of the Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition can rest assured that there aren't any worthwhile upgrades yet. http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2012/07/27/amd-fx-8120-review/8
Answer by updirons
If u have a microcenter nearby u need to buy cpu and mobo from them. Much cheaper than even newegg. Make sure u get an unlocked cpu designated w/ a K after it if u wanna overclock and make sure ur mobo supports overclocking. Get a z77 board. Get either a 2500k or 3570k. No AMD. End of story! http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/0d7229e7#/0d7229e7/2
Answer by C-Man
When it comes to gaming, it's no contest- get a Core i5... Any 2nd or 3rd generation Core i5 mops the floor with the FX-8150 in games. If you can get the 2500, fine. But if going with the 2400 saves you $ 20, do that and spend more on your GPU (which is what matters most) AMD's FX series processors aren't really optimized for gaming, and games don't utilize more than 4 cores (the overwhelming majority don't utilize more than 2-3). What matters is the speed and efficiency of the cores you've got, and in that respect Intel crushes AMD. http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/amd-fx-8120-6100-4100_6.html#sect0 On the graphics card side, don't waste money on the GTX 550 Ti, it's a slightly overpriced card. For just $ 5-$ 10 more you can get the more powerful GTX 560 SE (a newer-generation replacement for the 768MB GTX 460) or Radeon HD 7770. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130770 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127687 The GTX 560 SE is a 192-bit card, so it will perform about like the Radeon HD 6850 in BF3. It's slower than the older 1GB GTX 460 which is 256-bit, but still superior to the GTX 550 Ti. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-6790-barts-gpu-geforce-gtx-460,2917-5.html Even those cards are only enough to play BF3 on high settings, not ultra. To play BF3 on ultra settings at 1080p requires at least a $ 170 card like a Radeon HD 6870 or GeForce GTX 560. To play BF3 maxed at 1080p with all the eye candy enabled requires at least a $ 250 card like a Radeon HD 7850 or 448-core GeForce GTX 560 Ti. http://www.anandtech.com/show/5541/amd-radeon-hd-7750-radeon-hd-7770-ghz-edition-review/17 http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2012/03/05/amd-radeon-hd-7850-2gb/4 Minecraft is trivial, even $ 90 cards can play that on highest settings.
NEW 15" Quad-Core i7 Macbook Pro Benchmark and Speed Tests. This is the 2.2GHz model, 4GB, 500GB 7200RPM, and 1GB graphics card. www.twitter.com Facebook: www.facebook.com Thanks for Watching! 2011 15" Quad-Core i7 Macbook Pro: Speed Tests (2.2GHz 4GB 7200RPM) 2011 15" Quad-Core i7 Macbook Pro: Speed Tests (2.2GHz 4GB 7200RPM) 2011 15" Quad-Core i7 Macbook Pro: Speed Tests (2.2GHz 4GB 7200RPM)
bestcomputersprices.blogspot.com 2011 15" Quad-Core i7 Macbook Pro: Speed Tests (2.2GHz 4GB 7200RPM)
Not only do they get one of the best Android handsets available right now, but they get the best version with a quad-core processor too. If you ever thought about switching over to T-Mobile, now may be the best time to do so to get your hands on one of ... T-Mobile HTC One X+ is quad-core beast for US
Â
Huawei introduced a couple of their latest handsets during the Mobile World Congress 2012. One of them is called the Huawei Ascend D Quad XL. Huawei also dubbed their 2 latest mobile phones (Huawei Ascend D Quad and Huawei Ascend D Quad XL) as the fastest smartphones of today. Why? This is because both of these handsets are packed with amazing Quad-Core processors.
If you are seeing the Ascend D Quad XL for the very first time, then you won't be able to stop yourself from comparing this with the famous Samsung Galaxy S2. You are right, because this handset is similar when it comes to the design of the Galaxy S2.
The handset is quite light at 150 grams. It is also clad in think black plastic cover. The phone's actual dimensions are 129 x 64 x 10.9mm.
It is big and yet it is quite slim for its size. But the most amazing thing about this handset is its powerful processor. We are not talking about a dual-core processor here, this phone is packed with a quad-core processor which clocks at 1.5GHz. You can say that it is pretty capable of beating famous handsets of today. The good news doesn't end there. You want to know why? Well, this is because this handset is pre-installed with the latest Android Iteration the Ice Cream Sandwich. Not only do you get the most powerful processor on this phone, you will also get the most powerful Android OS to date.Now, this handset is packed with an 8MP shutter with a resolution of 3264 x 2448 pixels. Its video recording capability is at 1080 pixels and at 30 frames per second.
With this, you can get all of the nice and best shots while being trigger happy. The images and videos that you will capture on this handset are done with a blink of an eye. That is how powerful and fast this handset is.Going back to the phone's Quad-Core processor, you can say that it really makes a huge difference. This is most especially true if you are used to using a dual-core or single-core mobile phone. You know how tangible it is and how it is capable of loading things quickly. This is times two in the case of a quad-core handset. It is now more responsive as ever.
So with the powerful processor and Android OS of the Huawei Ascend D Quad XL, you are guaranteed of extremely fast mobile phone processing and best Ice Cream Sandwich OS features like never before.
Find More Huawei Ascend D Quad XL - ICS and Quad-Core Smartphone By Huawei Articles
0 comments:
Post a Comment